Proceedings of International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT  ·  2026/03/31  ·  Vol. 14  ·  Issue 1  ·  pp. 1171–1176
Binary Relation Fuzzy Soft Points for Decision-Making Applications
Asmhan Flieh Hassan, Zahraa Fadhil Abd Alhussain and Anfal Abdulrazzaq Atiyah
This paper introduces a new class of fuzzy soft structures termed binary relation–fuzzy soft points (BRFS-points), constructed through the composition of binary relation soft points and fuzzy points defined with respect to a power set. The proposed framework integrates two distinct mathematical concepts within a unified structure, combining the parameterization of binary relation soft sets with graded membership characteristics of fuzzy points. As a result, nine different types of BRFS-points are systematically derived based on different combinations of underlying fuzzy and binary relation soft point types, and each case is illustrated through representative examples. The introduced BRFS-points generalize existing notions of fuzzy soft points by providing a richer and more flexible representation of uncertainty in multi-parameter environments. In contrast to classical fuzzy soft point constructions, the proposed model captures additional structural information arising from binary relations on parameter sets, thereby enhancing the expressive power of the framework. The developed structure is applicable to binary relation–fuzzy soft topological spaces and related separation axioms, where the interaction between soft parameters and fuzzy membership degrees is essential. In particular, BRFS-points provide a mathematically consistent tool for analyzing and representing uncertainty in systems involving complex relationships between elements and parameters. Furthermore, the proposed framework is suitable for decision-making problems under uncertainty, where multiple criteria and interdependent parameters must be processed simultaneously. The model enables a structured aggregation of fuzzy and soft information, making it relevant for applied fields that require formal handling of imprecise or incomplete data.
Fuzzy Soft Point Binary Relation Soft Point Fuzzy Point W.R.T Power Set Binary Relation Fuzzy Soft Point.
References
  1. D. A. Molodtsov, “Soft-set theory - first results,” Comput. Math. Appl., vol. 37, no. 4-5, pp. 19-31, Feb. 1999.
  2. H. Aktas and N. Cagman, “Soft sets and soft groups,” Information Sciences, vol. 177, no. 13, pp. 233-240, 2007.
  3. A. Kharal and B. Ahmad, “Mappings on soft classes,” New Mathematics and Natural Computation, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1023-1033, 2010.
  4. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, pp. 338-353, 1965.
  5. P. K. Das and R. Borgohain, “An application of fuzzy soft set in multi-criteria decision making problems,” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 544-556, 2012.
  6. D. Chen, E. C. C. Tsang, D. S. Yeung, and X. Wang, “The parameterization reduction of soft sets and its applications,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 49, no. 5-6, pp. 757-763, 2005.
  7. J. C. R. Alcantud and G. Santos-García, “A new criterion for soft set based decision making problems under incomplete information,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 394-404, 2017.
  8. F. Fatimah, D. Rosadi, R. F. Hakim, et al., “Probabilistic soft sets and dual probabilistic soft sets in decision making with positive and negative parameters,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 983, no. 1, p. 012112, Mar. 2018.
  9. F. Fatimah, D. Rosadi, R. F. Hakim, et al., “N-soft sets and their decision making algorithms,” Soft Computing, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 3829-3842, 2018.
  10. J. C. R. Alcantud, F. Feng, and R. R. Yager, “An N-soft-set approach to rough sets,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 2996-3007, 2019.
  11. P. K. Maji, R. Biswas, and A. R. Roy, “Soft set theory,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 555-562, 2003.
  12. P. K. Maji, R. Biswas, and A. R. Roy, “A fuzzy soft set,” Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics, vol. 9, pp. 589-602, 2001.
  13. A. R. Roy and P. K. Maji, “A fuzzy soft set theoretical approach to decision making problems,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 203, pp. 412-418, 2007.
  14. F. Feng, Y. M. Li, and V. Leoreanu-Fotea, “Application of level soft sets in decision making based on interval-valued fuzzy soft sets,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 60, pp. 1756-1767, 2010.
  15. Z. F. Abd Alhussain and A. F. Hassan, “N-ary fuzzy soft set,” Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 2022.
  16. Z. F. Abd Alhussain and A. F. Hassan, “Binary-relation fuzzy soft matrix-theoretic image quality measure: Comparison with statistical similarity,” Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 799-804, 2023.
  17. A. A. Sangoor and A. F. Hassan, “Binary soft fuzzy points,” Boletim da Sociedade Paranaense de Matemática, accepted for publication, 2025.
  18. L. A. Al-Swidi and A. S. Saeed, Soft Fuzzy and Fuzzy Soft Set Theory with Applications, Noor Publication, 2020.

Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT by Anhalt University of Applied Sciences is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0  ·  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ICAIIT 2026
International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT
Navigation
Publisher
ISSN2199-8876
Location Anhalt University of Applied Sciences
Phone +49 (0) 3496 67 5611
Address Building 01, Room 425
Bernburger Str. 55
D-06366 Köthen, Germany
Open Access License

All works are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise noted.

Published by ICAIIT in cooperation with Anhalt University of Applied Sciences.

© 2026 ICAIIT — International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT. Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Köthen, Germany.
Visitors: site traffic counter