Proceedings of International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT  ·  2025/12/22  ·  Vol. 13  ·  Issue 5  ·  pp. 621–628
A Cross-Dataset Evaluation of Machine Learning Approaches for Autism Spectrum Disorder Across Age Groups
Lola Anančevska and Hristijan Gjoreski
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental condition that requires timely and accurate detection for effective intervention. This study evaluates the performance of six machine learning models—Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, Random Forest, XGBoost, and k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN)-in detecting ASD across three age groups, using three separate datasets: children, adolescents, and adults. Using a comprehensive dataset segmented by age, each model was assessed through stratified 10-fold cross-validation based on five key performance metrics: accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC). The findings indicate that ensemble and linear models, particularly XGBoost and Logistic Regression, consistently deliver the most reliable results across all age groups and the combined dataset, with high classification accuracy and balanced precision-recall tradeoffs. In contrast, kNN and Decision Tree models displayed inconsistent performance, often struggling with both false positives and false negatives. This analysis supports the application of advanced machine learning methods, especially ensemble techniques, for developing robust and generalizable ASD detection systems across diverse age demographics.
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Early Detection Clinical Data Machine Learning.
References
  1. R. J. Landa, A. L. Gross, E. A. Stuart, and A. Faherty, “Developmental trajectories in children with and without autism spectrum disorders: The first 3 years,” Child Development, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 429–442, Mar.–Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01870.x.
  2. H. Hodges, C. Fealko, and N. Soares, “Autism spectrum disorder: Definition, epidemiology, causes, and clinical evaluation,” Translational Pediatrics, vol. 9, suppl. 1, pp. S55–S65, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.21037/tp.2019.09.09.
  3. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators, “Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019,” The Lancet, vol. 396, no. 10258, pp. 1204–1222, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.
  4. M. B. Usta et al., “Use of machine learning methods in prediction of short-term outcome in autism spectrum disorders,” Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 320–325, 2019, doi: 10.1080/24750573.2018.1545334.
  5. K. Hyde, M. Novack, N. LaHaye, C. Parlett-Pelleriti, R. Anden, D. Dixon, and E. Linstead, “Applications of supervised machine learning in autism spectrum disorder research: A review,” Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 6, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s40489-019-00158-x.
  6. F. Thabtah, F. Kamalov, and K. Rajab, “A new computational intelligence approach to detect autistic features for autism screening,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 117, pp. 112–124, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.06.009.
  7. S. Alhassan, A. Soudani, and M. Almusallam, “Energy-efficient EEG-based scheme for autism spectrum disorder detection using wearable sensors,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 4, Art. no. 2228, 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23042228.
  8. N. Ali, “Autism spectrum disorder classification on electroencephalogram signal using deep learning algorithm,” IAES Int. J. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 91–99, 2020, doi: 10.11591/ijai.v9.i1.pp91-99.
  9. D. S. Sujana and D. P. Augustine, “Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: A review of three focused interventions,” SN Computer Science, vol. 4, Art. no. 139, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s42979-022-01584-1.
  10. Y. ElNakieb et al., “Understanding the role of connectivity dynamics of resting-state functional MRI in the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive study,” Bioengineering, vol. 10, no. 1, Art. no. 56, 2023, doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10010056.
  11. M. S. Farooq, R. Tehseen, M. Sabir, and Z. Atal, “Detection of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children and adults using machine learning,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, Art. no. 9605, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35910-1.
  12. R. Y.-Y. Chan, C. M. V. Wong, and Y. N. Yum, “Predicting behavior change in students with special education needs using multimodal learning analytics,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 63238–63251, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3288695.
  13. N. Kaur, A. Kaur, N. Dhiman, A. Sharma, and R. Rana, “A systematic analysis of detection of autism spectrum disorder: IoT perspective,” Int. J. Innovative Science and Modern Engineering, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 10–13, 2020, doi: 10.35940/ijisme.F1219.046620.
  14. S. Dedgaonkar, R. K. Sachdeva-Bedi, K. Kothari, R. Loya, and S. Godbole, “Role of IoT and ML for autistic people,” Int. J. Future Generation Communication and Networking, vol. 13, no. 3s, pp. 773–781, 2020.
  15. F. Thabtah, “Autistic spectrum disorder screening data for children,” UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2017.
  16. F. Thabtah, “Autism screening adult,” UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2017.
  17. F. Thabtah, “Autistic spectrum disorder screening data for adolescent,” UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2017.
  18. J. Brownlee, “Train-test split for evaluating machine learning algorithms,” Machine Learning Mastery, 2020.
  19. J. Wei and Z. Hou, “Binary encoding for label,” 2022, doi: 10.36227/techrxiv.21353763.
  20. J. Obregon and J.-Y. Jung, “Explanation of ensemble models,” in Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Academic Press, 2022, pp. 51–72, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-85648-5.00011-6.
  21. J. Wu, X.-Y. Chen, H. Zhang, L.-D. Xiong, H. Lei, and S.-H. Deng, “Hyperparameter optimization for machine learning models based on Bayesian optimization,” Journal of Electronic Science and Technology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 26–40, 2019, doi: 10.11989/JEST.1674-862X.80904120.
  22. H. Jeong and B. Zou, “Linear classifier models for binary classification,” 2023.
  23. M. Awad and R. Khanna, “Support vector machines for classification,” 2015, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4302-5990-9_3.
  24. L. Rokach and O. Maimon, “Decision trees,” 2005, doi: 10.1007/0-387-25465-X_9.
  25. Z. Ali et al., “Extreme gradient boosting algorithm with machine learning: A review,” Academic Journal of Nawroz University, vol. 12, pp. 320–334, 2023, doi: 10.25007/ajnu.v12n2a1612.
  26. G. Guo, H. Wang, D. Bell, Y. Bi, and K. Greer, “KNN model-based approach in classification,” in Proc. OTM Confederated Int. Conf., LNCS, vol. 2888, 2003, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-39964-3_62.
  27. T. Saito and M. Rehmsmeier, “The precision-recall plot is more informative than the ROC plot when evaluating binary classifiers on imbalanced datasets,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 3, Art. no. e0118432, 2015, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118432.
  28. Ž. Đ. Vujović, “Classification model evaluation metrics,” Int. J. Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 12, no. 6, 2021, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120670.
  29. S. Swaminathan and B. R. Tantri, “Confusion matrix-based performance evaluation metrics,” African Journal of Biomedical Research, vol. 27, pp. 4023–4031, 2024, doi: 10.53555/AJBR.v27i4S.4345.
  30. R. Diallo, C. Edalo, and O. O. Awe, “Machine learning evaluation of imbalanced health data: A comparative analysis of balanced accuracy, MCC, and F1 score,” in Practical Statistical Learning and Data Science Methods. Springer, 2025, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-72215-8_12.
  31. J. Huang and C. X. Ling, “Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms,” IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 299–310, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2005.50.
  32. T. M. Dutschmann et al., “Large-scale evaluation of k-fold cross-validation ensembles for uncertainty estimation,” Journal of Cheminformatics, vol. 15, Art. no. 49, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13321-023-00709-9.
  33. S. L. Hyman, S. E. Levy, and S. M. Myers, “Identification, evaluation, and management of children with autism spectrum disorder,” Pediatrics, vol. 145, no. 1, Art. no. e20193447, 2020, doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3447.
  34. M. C. Lai and S. Baron-Cohen, “Identifying the lost generation of adults with autism spectrum conditions,” The Lancet Psychiatry, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 1013–1027, 2015, doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00277-1.
  35. F. Happé, R. A. Charlton, and B. Maughan, “Autism and age: Findings from the SNAP cohort,” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 1025–1033, 2016, doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12559.
  36. D. S. Mandell et al., “Racial/ethnic disparities in the identification of children with autism spectrum disorders,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 493–498, 2009, doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.131243.
  37. K. A. Wantchekon, M. Satterthwaite-Freiman, and A. J. Umaña-Taylor, “Ethnic-racial identity among White adolescents: Patterns and links to adjustment,” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, vol. 98, Art. no. 101772, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2025.101772.
  38. M. C. Lai, M. V. Lombardo, and S. Baron-Cohen, “Autism,” The Lancet, vol. 383, no. 9920, pp. 896–910, 2014, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61539-1.
  39. C. Cordero et al., “Neonatal jaundice in association with autism spectrum disorder and developmental disorder,” Journal of Perinatology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 219–225, 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0452-4.
  40. R. D. Maimburg, B. H. Bech, M. Væth, B. Møller-Madsen, and J. Olsen, “Neonatal jaundice, autism, and other disorders of psychological development,” Pediatrics, vol. 126, no. 5, pp. 872–878, 2010, doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0052.

Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT by Anhalt University of Applied Sciences is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0  ·  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ICAIIT 2026
International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT
Navigation
Publisher
ISSN2199-8876
Location Anhalt University of Applied Sciences
Phone +49 (0) 3496 67 5611
Address Building 01, Room 425
Bernburger Str. 55
D-06366 Köthen, Germany
Open Access License

All works are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise noted.

Published by ICAIIT in cooperation with Anhalt University of Applied Sciences.

© 2026 ICAIIT — International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT. Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Köthen, Germany.
Visitors: site traffic counter