Mutual Influence of Opposite TCP Flows in a Congested Network

Nikolai Mareev, Dmytro Syzov, Dmytry Kachan, Kirill Karpov, Maksim Iushchenko, Eduard Siemens

References:

1. Ch. Peng Fu and S. Liew, “TCP veno: TCP enhancement for transmission over wireless access networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 216–228, February 2003.
2. L.S. Brakmo and L.L. Peterson, “TCP vegas: end to end congestion avoidance on a global internet,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1465-1480, October 1995.
3. S. Ha, I. Rhee and L. Xu, “CUBIC: a new TCPfriendly high-speed TCP variant,” ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 64-74, July 2008.
4. A. Baiocchi, A. P. Castellani, and F. Vacirca, “YeAHTCP: Yet another highspeed TCP,” In proc. The fifth PFLDNET workshop, February 2007.
5. N. Cardwell, Y. Cheng, C. S. Gunn, S. H. Yeganeh, and Van Jacobson, “BBR: congestion-based congestion control,” vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 58-66, January 2017.
6. Future Internet Lab Anhalt. [Online]. Available: https://fila-lab.de/
7. J. Gettys, “Bufferbloat: Dark Buffers in the Internet,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 96-96, May 2011.
8. M. Hock, R. Bless and M. Zitterbart, “Toward coexistence of different congestion control mechanisms,” IEEE 41st Conference on Local Computer Net-works (LCN), pp. 567-570, November 2016.
9. K. Miyazawa, K. Sasaki, N. Oda and S. Yamaguchi, “Cycle and divergence of performance on TCP BBR,” IEEE 7th International Conference on Cloud Networking (CloudNet), October 2018.
10. N. Mareev, D. Kachan, K. Karpov, D. Syzov and Siemens, “Efficiency of BQL Congestion Control under High Bandwidth - Delay Product Network Conditions,” Proc. of the 7th International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT, (ICAIIT), pp. 19–22, March 2019.
11. K. Sasaki, M. Hanai, K. Miyazawa, A. Kobayashi, N. Oda and S. Yamaguchi, “TCP Fairness Among Modern TCP Congestion Control Algorithms Including TCP BBR,” IEEE 7th International Conference on Cloud Networking (CloudNet), October 2018.
12. Leaders in network emulation and testing. [Online]. Available: https://www.apposite-tech.com/
13. End-to-end cloud driven networking solutions. [Online]. Available: https://www.extremenetworks.com/
14. A. Dhamdhere, Hao Jiang and C. Dovrolis, “Buffer sizing for congested internet links,” Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, vol. 2, 2005, pp. 1072-1083.
15. C. S. Curtis Villamizar, “High performance TCP in ANSNET,” ACM Computer Communications Review, pp. 45-60, September 1994.
16. iPerf - the TCP, UDP and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool. [Online]. Available: https://iperf.fr/
17. T. Lukaseder, L. Bradatsch, B. Erb, R. W. Heijden and F. Kargl, “A Comparison of TCP Congestion Control Algorithms in 10G Networks,” IEEE 41st Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN), pp. 706-714, November 2016.
18. R. Al-Saadi, G. Armitage, J. But and P. Branch, “A survey of delay-based and hybrid TCP congestion control algorithms,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 3609-3638, 2019.
19. A. Kuzmanovic and E. Knightly, “TCP-LP: a distributed algorithm for low priority data transfer,” IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, vol. 3, pp. 1691-1701, 2003.
20. D. Rossi, C. Testa, S. Valenti and L. Muscariello, “LEDBAT: The new BitTorrent congestion control protocol,” in Proc. of 19th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (IC-CCN 2010), August 2010.
21. D. Syzov, D. Kachan and E. Siemens, “High-speed UDP data transmission with multithreading and automatic resource allocation,” Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT,(ICAIIT), pp. 51-55, March 2016.