Proceedings of International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT  ·  2026/07/22  ·  Vol. 14  ·  Issue 4  ·  pp. 1563–1569
Comparison of Dynamic Characteristics of a Residential Building Using Ambient Vibration Testing and Finite Element Modal Analysis
Asadulla Khotamov, Sardor Rashidov, Sirojiddin Kholbekov, Fitrat Abdikhalilov and Jörg Röder
This study compares the dynamic characteristics of a six-storey residential building in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, using ambient vibration testing and finite element modal analysis. The building is located in a high seismic hazard zone, which makes reliable evaluation of its dynamic behavior essential for seismic safety assessment. The research combines in-situ microseismic measurements with numerical simulation to examine the consistency between experimentally identified and analytically predicted vibration parameters. Ambient vibration data were recorded using PCB Piezotronics 393B05 triaxial accelerometers and an 80-channel data acquisition system, and the signals were processed in MATLAB to determine the fundamental natural frequencies and periods of the structure in the principal directions. The measured values were 2.89 Hz and 0.34 s along the X-axis, and 2.95 Hz and 0.33 s along the Y-axis. In parallel, a three-dimensional structural model was developed in LIRA-SAPR 2022 to perform modal and seismic response analysis under permanent, live, and seismic loads. The numerical modal analysis produced a fundamental frequency of approximately 2.89 Hz, which was close to the experimentally identified values of 2.89 Hz and 2.95 Hz along the principal structural axes. The calculated displacements also remained within the allowable limits specified by KMK 2.01.03-19. Comparison of the experimental and numerical results showed close agreement, with only minor differences between the identified dynamic parameters. The findings confirm that ambient vibration testing is an effective tool for validating FEM-based models of existing buildings and can significantly improve the reliability of seismic performance assessment in earthquake-prone regions.
Building Structure Technical Condition Earthquake Resistance Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) Seismic Sensors Ambient Vibration Triaxial Accelerometer
References
  1. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PF-184, “On measures to further improve state control and management in ensuring the seismic resistance and seismic safety of buildings and structures,” Oct. 20, 2025.
  2. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. 713, “On ensuring seismic safety of the population and territory of the Republic of Uzbekistan,” Art. 14, “Inspection and monitoring of seismic resistance of buildings and structures.”
  3. Interstate Scientific and Technical Commission for Standardization, Technical Regulation and Conformity Assessment in Construction, Buildings and Structures. Rules for Inspection and Monitoring of Technical Condition, GOST 31937-2024, 2024.
  4. Y.-J. Cha, W. Choi, and O. Büyüköztürk, “Deep learning-based crack damage detection using convolutional neural networks,” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., vol. 32, pp. 361-378, 2017.
  5. A. T. Khotamov, S. R. Kholbekov, and S. U. Rashidov, “Digital simulation model for assessing the level of earthquake damage of buildings,” Miasto Przyszłości Kielce, vol. 54, 2024.
  6. State Committee for Construction Standards, System for Ensuring the Accuracy of Geometrical Parameters in Construction. Process Tolerances, GOST 21779-82 (ST SEV 2681-80), 1982.
  7. Y. Nakamura, “A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface,” Q. Rep. Railway Tech. Res. Inst. (RTRI), vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 25-33, 1989.
  8. A. Mamatov, X. Sotvoldiyev, M. Talipov, S. Shaumarov, K. Gafarbayli, and D. Bekmirzaev, “Metrological calibration and uncertainty evaluation of MEMS accelerometers for structural health monitoring in seismic regions,” Vibroengineering Procedia, vol. 62, pp. 140-144, Jun. 2026, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2026.26360.
  9. F. Lamonaca, C. Scuro, P. F. Sciammarella, D. L. Carnì, and R. Olivito, “Internet of things for structural health monitoring,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop Metrology Ind. 4.0 IoT, Apr. 2018, pp. 73-78.
  10. B. Harsono, F. M. Mahadiva, Tavio, M. M. Talipov, and H. Hermawan, “Pushover analysis of simple house structures in seismic zones,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 3374, no. 1, art. no. 050035, Mar. 2026, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0319164.
  11. I. Mirzaev, D. Bekmirzaev, E. Kosimov, E. An, N. Nishonov, and M. Talipov, “Seismodynamics of segmented underground pipeline systems based on real earthquake records,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 3447, no. 1, art. no. 060001, May 2026, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/12.0044018.
  12. Ministry of Construction of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Construction in Seismic Areas, Construction Norms and Rules KMK 2.01.03-19, Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 2019.


Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT by Anhalt University of Applied Sciences is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
 ·  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ICAIIT 2026
International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT
Navigation
Publisher
ISSN2199-8876
Location Anhalt University of Applied Sciences
Phone +49 (0) 3496 67 5611
Address Building 01, Room 425
Bernburger Str. 55
D-06366 Köthen, Germany
Open Access License

All works are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise noted.

Published by ICAIIT in cooperation with Anhalt University of Applied Sciences.

© 2026 ICAIIT — International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT. Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Köthen, Germany.
Visitors: site traffic counter