Proceedings of International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT  ·  2026/07/22  ·  Vol. 14  ·  Issue 4  ·  pp. 1203–1209
An Analytical AI-Driven Diagnostic Model for Early Fault Detection in Aircraft Avionic Devices
Abdurashid Abdukayumov, Izzat Maturazov, Shavkat Saydakhmedov, Akmal Joraev and Dauitbay Sarsenbaev
This paper presents an analytical model of an intelligent diagnostic system designed for early fault detection in aircraft radio-electronic (avionic) devices. Traditional threshold-based methods are limited by low sensitivity and inability to model nonlinear dependencies among system parameters. The proposed AI-based model, calibrated on vibration, temperature, and pressure data from the FADEC (Full Authority Digital Engine Control) of a Pratt & Whitney PW127M engine (ATR-72 aircraft), applies a nonlinear mapping evaluated using a binary cross-entropy metric. Uncertainty quantification is introduced using a Beta distribution, enabling calculation of a 95 % confidence interval for diagnostic reliability. Experimental validation shows a diagnostic accuracy of 93 ± 2 % and false-alarm rate below 8 %, demonstrating promising predictive performance under simulated operating conditions. The system ensures real-time data fusion between onboard and ground maintenance units, providing a foundation for predictive and sustainable aviation maintenance. The proposed framework provides probabilistic, confidence-aware diagnostics suitable for real-time deployment and supports risk-informed maintenance decisions aligned with modern aviation certification and Maintenance 4.0 requirements.
Intelligent Diagnostics Predictive Maintenance Avionics Systems Fault Modeling Machine Learning Confidence Estimation Flight Safety
References
  1. J. Lee, B. Bagheri, and H.-A. Kao, “A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems,” Manufacturing Letters, 2014.
  2. Y. Lei, N. Li, L. Guo, N. Li, T. Yan, and J. Lin, “Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 104, pp. 799-834, May 2018, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.016.
  3. R. Zhao, R. Yan, Z. Chen, K. Mao, P. Wang, and R. X. Gao, “Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 115, pp. 213-237, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.050.
  4. J. Lee, H.-A. Kao, and S. Yang, “Service innovation and smart analytics for Industry 4.0 and big data environment,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 16, pp. 3-8, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.001.
  5. A. Abdukayumov and I. S. Maturazov, “Improvement of radio electronic equipment diagnostic systems,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2432, Art. no. 030044, Jun. 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0090223.
  6. E. S. Agustian and Z. A. Pratama, “Artificial intelligence application on aircraft maintenance: A systematic literature review,” EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things, vol. 10, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4108/eetiot.6938.
  7. A. Bentaleb, K. Toumlal, and J. Abouchabaka, “Predicting aircraft engine failures using artificial intelligence,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 15, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150295.
  8. Y. Gal and Z. Ghahramani, “Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning,” in Proc. 33rd Int. Conf. Machine Learning (ICML), New York, NY, USA, 2016, pp. 1050-1059.
  9. A. Kendall and Y. Gal, “What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?,” 2017, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.04977.
  10. A. Saxena and K. Goebel, “Turbofan Engine Degradation Simulation Dataset,” NASA PHM Repository.
  11. F. Tao et al., “Digital twin-driven product lifecycle management,” IEEE Access, 2019.
  12. K. R. Patibandla, “Predictive maintenance in aviation using artificial intelligence,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence General Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 325-333, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.60087/jaigs.v4i1.214.
  13. P. Nunes, J. Santos, and E. Rocha, “Challenges in predictive maintenance - A review,” CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, vol. 40, pp. 53-67, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.11.004.


Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT by Anhalt University of Applied Sciences is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
 ·  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ICAIIT 2026
International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT
Navigation
Publisher
ISSN2199-8876
Location Anhalt University of Applied Sciences
Phone +49 (0) 3496 67 5611
Address Building 01, Room 425
Bernburger Str. 55
D-06366 Köthen, Germany
Open Access License

All works are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise noted.

Published by ICAIIT in cooperation with Anhalt University of Applied Sciences.

© 2026 ICAIIT — International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT. Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Köthen, Germany.
Visitors: site traffic counter