Proceedings of International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT  ·  2026/07/22  ·  Vol. 14  ·  Issue 4  ·  pp. 933–939
Sensor-Based Technologies and AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support System for Enhanced Skin Wound Healing
Ibodjon Ismoilov
Delayed skin wound healing remains a significant clinical challenge due to the complex interaction between local wound microenvironment instability, systemic inflammatory responses, and patient-specific comorbidities. This prospective comparative study evaluated whether integration of sensor-based wound monitoring with an artificial intelligence-driven clinical decision support system (AI-CDSS) improves regenerative outcomes compared with conventional care. A total of 120 patients were allocated into three groups (n=40 each): standard wound care, standard care with sensor-based monitoring, and sensor monitoring integrated with AI-CDSS. Dynamic clinical parameters, microenvironment indicators (temperature, pH, moisture), and immunological markers (CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-10) were assessed over 28 days. By Day 14, mean wound area reduction reached 67% ± 17 in the sensor + AI group compared with 52% ± 18 in the sensor-only group and 38% ± 16 under standard care. Complete wound closure by Day 28 occurred in 75.0% of patients in the AI-supported group versus 60.0% and 45.0% in the sensor-only and conventional groups, respectively. Systemic therapy escalation was reduced to 5.0% in the AI group compared with 20.0% in standard care. The AI model demonstrated strong predictive performance for delayed healing (accuracy 86.7%, sensitivity 84.0%, specificity 88.5%, AUC 0.91) and provided a median alert lead-time of 3.2 days before clinical deterioration. These findings indicate that combining real-time sensor data with AI-based interpretation accelerates microenvironment normalization, reduces inflammatory burden, improves epithelialization dynamics, and enhances overall healing efficiency. The integrated sensor-AI approach represents a data-driven strategy for precision wound management and resource optimization in modern regenerative medicine.
Delayed Wound Healing Skin Wounds Biosensor-Based Monitoring Artificial Intelligence
References
  1. C. K. Sen, S. Roy, and G. M. Gordillo, “Wound healing: Current status and emerging therapeutic strategies,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 303-316, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12934.
  2. R. D. Wolcott, D. D. Rhoads, and S. E. Dowd, “Biofilms and chronic wound inflammation,” Journal of Wound Care, vol. 29, Suppl. 2, pp. S6-S11, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2020.29.Sup2.S6.
  3. A. Kassab, G. Youssef, and A. Elshazly, “Smart wound dressings and sensors for real-time monitoring of wound healing,” Biosensors, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 259, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12040259.
  4. Z. Li, L. Wang, and Y. Zheng, “Artificial intelligence-based decision support systems in wound care management,” Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol. 118, p. 102135, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102135.
  5. K. Harding, D. Queen, and D. G. Armstrong, “Clinical challenges in chronic wound management,” International Wound Journal, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 623-626, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13316.
  6. R. G. Frykberg and J. Banks, “Challenges in the treatment of chronic wounds,” Advances in Wound Care, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 81-94, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2021.0020.
  7. Y. Liu, X. Zhang, and S. Wang, “Integration of biosensors and machine learning for personalized wound healing prediction,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2850-2859, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2023.3254178.
  8. R. S. Kirsner and G. Eaglstein, “The wound healing process,” Dermatologic Clinics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1-7, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2012.08.002.
  9. M. A. Nuutila and E. Eriksson, “Moist wound healing with commonly available dressings,” Advances in Wound Care, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 685-698, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2020.1231.
  10. J. Wang, X. Wang, and Y. Zhang, “Artificial intelligence in chronic wound care: A systematic review,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 1743, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051743.


Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT by Anhalt University of Applied Sciences is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
 ·  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ICAIIT 2026
International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT
Navigation
Publisher
ISSN2199-8876
Location Anhalt University of Applied Sciences
Phone +49 (0) 3496 67 5611
Address Building 01, Room 425
Bernburger Str. 55
D-06366 Köthen, Germany
Open Access License

All works are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise noted.

Published by ICAIIT in cooperation with Anhalt University of Applied Sciences.

© 2026 ICAIIT — International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT. Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Köthen, Germany.
Visitors: site traffic counter