Coal-dependent economies increasingly face a policy dilemma: ambitious carbon neutrality commitments coexist with continued expansion of coal-fired power generation. Quantitative approaches for measuring the consistency between climate commitments and actual energy policy remain limited. This study develops a novel Climate-Energy Policy Inconsistency Index (CEPII) and applies it to Kazakhstan, where the national carbon neutrality target coexists with a large-scale coal expansion program. The proposed framework combines structured policy analysis, scenario-based estimation of CO₂ emissions and carbon costs, and cross-country comparative assessment. The results indicate that the planned expansion would generate 19.5-33.3 Mt CO₂ annually, representing approximately 7-8% of Kazakhstan's current greenhouse gas emissions. At the current domestic carbon price, annual carbon costs remain negligible compared with those under the EU Emissions Trading System, explaining the continued economic attractiveness of coal investment. Cross-country comparison further demonstrates that Kazakhstan exhibits the highest level of climate-energy policy inconsistency among the selected coal-dependent economies, primarily due to the combination of ambitious climate commitments and weak carbon pricing. The proposed framework offers a reproducible analytical tool for evaluating policy coherence and supports the design of carbon pricing and energy transition policies in coal-dependent economies.
Agora Energiewende, Towards a Clean Energy Future in Kazakhstan: Designing a Robust and Fair Transition Away from Coal, 2024.
D. Akhmetov and P. Howie, "Coal-based generators' corporate response to an emissions trading scheme in Kazakhstan," Utilities Policy, vol. 90, Art. no. 101797, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2024.101797.
Bureau of National Statistics of the Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan, "Gross domestic product volume index dynamics," 2025. [Online]. Available: https://stat.gov.kz
R. De Miglio and A. Bakdolotov, "A risk-induced emission mitigation pathway for Kazakhstan," Energy Strategy Reviews, vol. 52, Art. no. 101332, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2024.101332.
F. W. Geels, "Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case study," Research Policy, vol. 31, nos. 8-9, pp. 1257-1274, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
Global Energy Monitor, Boom and Bust Coal 2026: Tracking the Global Coal Plant Pipeline, 2026.
Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Nationally Determined Contribution of the Republic of Kazakhstan to the Global Response to Climate Change Until 2035, Government Resolution No. XX, 2026.
Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan, National Project "Development of Coal-Fired Power Generation," Government Resolution No. 184, Mar. 20, 2026.
F. M. Hoffart et al., "Energy asset stranding in resource-rich developing countries and the just transition," Frontiers in Environmental Economics, vol. 3, Art. no. 1273315, 2024, doi: 10.3389/frevc.2024.1273315.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change, Annex III: Technology-Specific Cost and Performance Parameters, 2014.
International Carbon Action Partnership, Emissions Trading Worldwide: Status Report 2025, 2025.
International Energy Agency (IEA), Coal 2025: Analysis and Forecast to 2027, 2025.
International Energy Agency (IEA), Global Energy Review 2025, 2025.
International Trade Centre and QazTrade, Assessing CBAM Readiness in Kazakhstan: Supporting the Compliance and Green Transition of Kazakhstan Exporters in Aluminium, Iron and Steel Sectors, 2026.
M. Jakob et al., "The future of coal in a carbon-constrained climate," Nature Climate Change, vol. 10, pp. 704-707, 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41558-020-0866-1.
P. Newell and D. Mulvaney, "The political economy of the just transition," The Geographical Journal, vol. 179, no. 2, pp. 132-140, 2013, doi: 10.1111/geoj.12008.
OECD, Effective Carbon Rates 2025: Pricing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Through Taxes and Emissions Trading, 2026, doi: 10.1787/a5a5d71f-en.
P.-Y. Oei, H. Hermann, P. Herpich, O. Holtemöller, B. Lünenbürger, and C. Schult, "Coal phase-out in Germany: Implications and policies for affected regions," Energy, vol. 196, Art. no. 117004, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117004.
H.-W. Sinn, "Public policies against global warming: A supply-side approach," International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 360-394, 2008, doi: 10.1007/s10797-008-9082-z.
B. K. Sovacool, "How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions," Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 13, pp. 202-215, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020.
G. C. Unruh, "Understanding carbon lock-in," Energy Policy, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 817-830, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7.
World Bank, Kazakhstan Country Climate and Development Report, 2022.
N. Zhakiyev et al., "Green energy in grey areas: The financial and policy challenges of Kazakhstan's energy transition," Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 124, Art. no. 104046, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2025.104046.
N. Zhakiyev et al., "Optimization modelling of the decarbonization scenario of the total energy system of Kazakhstan until 2060," Energies, vol. 16, no. 13, Art. no. 5142, 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16135142.