Proceedings of International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT  ·  2026/06/12  ·  Vol. 14  ·  Issue 3  ·  pp. 737–746
Machine Learning Framework for Oil Production Forecasting
Doaa Reyadh Mudheher and Firas Sabar Miften
The prediction of oil well performance and decline rates is important for field management, because these factors can be directly used to model the planning of production as well as operational decision. Classical prediction tools suffer from several difficulties, particularly in terms of the complexity and variable nature of the data. This work proposes an Artificial Intelligence (AI) approach based on machine learning (ML) for predicting oil well production. A case study was based on data from the Volve oil field in Norway. Pre-processing was performed to ensure effective and robust modelling predictions. This included searching for outliers using the IQR method and replacing them with NaNs (missing values). A machine learning based method, Random Forest that learned the entire data to fill in these missing entries was adopted. each feature having missing values were temporarily considered as a target and predicted from the rest of features. Feature relevance was evaluated using the correlation coefficient of each dependent variable with the target (BORE_OIL_VOL). Scaling of all the numerical attributes was carried out and data set has been divided into train set (80%) and test sets (20%). The prediction performance of the forecasting method was improved using an ensemble model of Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Random Forest (RF). The experimental results indicated the new model improved the prediction ability of oil well production, since we achieved to RMSE = 37.7969, R2 = 0.9954 and MAE =17.5485. These metrics demonstrate the reliability of our method. The study shows that the ensemble learning models provide good prediction results of oil well productivity and can act as a promising decision-making approach for oil field management.
Volve Oil Field SVR RF Preprocessing Data Machine Learning.
References
  1. Q. Wang et al., “Precise prediction of choke oil rate in critical flow condition via surface data,” J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol., vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1-18, Jul. 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-025-02013-8.
  2. W. P. Bai, S. Q. Cheng, X. Y. Guo, Y. Wang, Q. Guo and C. D. Tan, “Oilfield analogy and productivity prediction based on machine learning: Field cases in PL oilfield, China,” Pet. Sci., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 2554-2570, Aug. 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2024.02.018.
  3. K. Ma, C. Wu, Y. Huang, P. Mu and P. Shi, “Oil well productivity capacity prediction based on support vector machine optimized by improved whale algorithm,” J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol., vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 3251-3260, Dec. 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-024-01873-w.
  4. M. AlRassas et al., “Knowledge-based machine learning approaches to predict oil production rate in the oil reservoir,” in Springer Series in Geomechanics, Springer, 2024, pp. 282-304, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0268-8_24.
  5. M. Khan, A. Sakib, A. Samad, M. Shakil Rahaman and M. A. Islam, “Data-driven approach to predict future oil production of an oil field using machine learning techniques,” SciEn Publ. Gr., pp. 68-73, Jan. 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.38032/scse.2025.3.16.
  6. M. Fang, H. Shi, H. Li and T. Liu, “Application of machine learning for productivity prediction in tight gas reservoirs,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1-27, Apr. 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17081916.
  7. M. Pang, Z. Zhang, Z. Zhou, W. Zhou and Q. Li, “Estimated ultimate recovery prediction of shale gas wells based on stacked integrated learning algorithm,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1-19, Dec. 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03801-2.
  8. S. Bhattacharyya and A. Vyas, “Application of machine learning in predicting oil rate decline for Bakken shale oil wells,” Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, Dec. 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20401-6.
  9. J. Liu et al., “Production prediction and influencing factors analysis of horizontal well plunger gas lift based on interpretable machine learning,” Processes, vol. 12, pp. 1-25, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091888.
  10. R. Zhu et al., “Well-production forecasting using machine learning with feature selection and automatic hyperparameter optimization,” Energies, vol. 18, no. 1, Jan. 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/en18010099.
  11. H. Y. Tang et al., “Production decline curve analysis of shale oil wells: a case study of Bakken, Eagle Ford and Permian,” Pet. Sci., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 4262-4277, Dec. 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2024.07.029.
  12. M. Ghodsi, P. Vaziri, M. Kanaani and B. Sedaee, “Optimizing oil production forecasts in Iranian oil fields: a comprehensive analysis using ensemble learning techniques,” J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol., 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-025-01976-y.
  13. Y. Hu, X. Xin, G. Yu and W. Deng, “Deep insight: an efficient hybrid model for oil well production forecasting using spatio-temporal convolutional networks and Kolmogorov-Arnold networks,” Sci. Rep., 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4988083/v1.
  14. N. M. Ibrahim, A. A. Alharbi, T. A. Alzahrani, A. M. Abdulkarim, I. A. Alessa and D. A. Alqahtani, “Well performance classification and prediction: deep learning and machine learning long term regression experiments on oil, gas, and water production,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 14, p. 5326, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/s22145326.
  15. F. Ma et al., “Predictive modeling of oil rate for wells under gas lift using machine learning,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1-26, Dec. 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12129-w.
  16. Y. Zhou, Z. Gu, C. He, J. Yang and J. Xiong, “An improved decline curve analysis method via ensemble,” Energies, vol. 17, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17235910.
  17. Z. Ding et al., “Production decline rate prediction for offshore high water-cut reservoirs by integrating moth-flame optimization with extreme gradient boosting tree,” Processes, vol. 13, pp. 1-17, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13072266.


Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT by Anhalt University of Applied Sciences is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
 ·  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ICAIIT 2026
International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT
Navigation
Publisher
ISSN2199-8876
Location Anhalt University of Applied Sciences
Phone +49 (0) 3496 67 5611
Address Building 01, Room 425
Bernburger Str. 55
D-06366 Köthen, Germany
Open Access License

All works are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise noted.

Published by ICAIIT in cooperation with Anhalt University of Applied Sciences.

© 2026 ICAIIT — International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT. Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Köthen, Germany.
Visitors: site traffic counter