Proceedings of International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT  ·  2026/06/12  ·  Vol. 14  ·  Issue 3  ·  pp. 93–103
Blockchain Based Digital Evidence Verification System
Anwar Faris Khaleel and Khalid Kadhim Jabbar
This framework focuses on verifying the ownership of digital evidence and authenticity with the help of localized tamper detection on a blockchain platform. Even though authentication has been tried before, there are concerns over the inability to make the data immutable and as to where exactly the modification is taking place. The algorithm divides the original image into 8x8 pixel blocks, which are non-overlapping, followed by cryptographic hash generation of the content of the block separately. The created partial hashes are then stored on an underlying layer of a decentralized blockchain to ensure immutability. The system allows comparison in two modes to achieve reliability, which includes block-level comparison of the recovered hashes and comparison upon reconstructing the original image. Also, at the stage of the interactive analysis of the workflow, sophisticated forensic tools are employed, such as Error Level Analysis and the Copy-and-Move algorithm, in order to identify the type and character of manipulations at the identified locations. Empirical evidence demonstrates that the technique offers an indelible computerized fingerprint of each portion of the photograph and deters an area that was altered; therefore, it enhances the dependability in a legal setting involving computerized evidence.
Blockchain Digital Evidence The Image Authentication Tamper Detection Image Forensics A Block Hashing Level Analysis.
References
  1. P. Santamaría, L. Tobarra, R. Pastor-Vargas, and A. Robles-Gómez, “Smart contracts for managing the chain-of-custody of digital evidence: A practical case of study,” Smart Cities, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 709-727, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6020034.
  2. M. S. Akhtar and T. Feng, “Using blockchain to ensure the integrity of digital forensic evidence in an IoT environment,” EAI Endorsed Transactions on Creative Technologies, vol. 9, no. 31, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.3-6-2022.174089.
  3. H. Patil, R. K. Kohli, S. Puri, and P. Puri, “Potential applicability of blockchain technology in the maintenance of chain of custody in forensic casework,” Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 14, Art. no. 12, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-023-00383-w.
  4. H. S. Shrunga, M. Ashwini, U. Deepthi, R. Spandana, and K. R. Rakesh, “A survey on blockchain based digital forensics framework,” International Journal of Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 2542-2549, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.41841.
  5. H. Christine, K. T. Novelianto, M. Restiawati, H. Y. Jayanti, and A. Afriyadi, “A study of permissioned blockchain-based framework for land ownership tracking in Indonesia,” Interkom, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 119-126, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.35969/interkom.v17i3.258.
  6. F. Ghozzi, K. K. Jabbar, and A. Fakhfakh, “Image Authentication Proofing Scheme Based on RLG by Employing the Characteristics of DCT,” Iraqi Journal of Science, 2025, doi: 10.24996/ijs.2025.66.9.34.
  7. B. A. Salim, H. A. Younis, and M. A. Aljabery, “A study on secure image encryption based on blockchain,” Iraqi Journal of Intelligent Computing and Informatics (IJICI), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 22-29, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.52940/ijici.v3i1.88.
  8. S. K. Gaid and K. K. Jabbar, “Frequency Domain for Color Image Authentication Proofing,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1963, no. 1, p. 012094, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1963/1/012094.
  9. R. Kumar et al., “Blockchain and homomorphic encryption based privacy-preserving model aggregation for medical images,” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 102, p. 102139, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2022.102139.
  10. K. K. Jabbar and G. Y. Whaib, “Image encryption using RC4 based 5D-chaotic system under spatial domain,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2591, p. 030016, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0120413.
  11. M. Bin Saif, S. Migliorini, and F. Spoto, “Efficient and Secure Distributed Data Storage and Retrieval Using Interplanetary File System and Blockchain,” Future Internet, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 98, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16030098.
  12. A. R. Javed, W. Ahmed, M. Alazab, Z. Jalil, K. Kifayat, and T. R. Gadekallu, “A comprehensive survey on computer forensics: State-of-the-art, tools, techniques, challenges, and future directions,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 11065-11089, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3142508.
  13. S. A. Mohsin and R. A. Muhajjar, “A Review of Blockchain Based Solutions for Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Management,” Iraqi J. Intell. Comput. Inf., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 90-102, 2025.
  14. O. Kuznetsov, P. Sernani, L. Romeo, E. Frontoni, and A. Mancini, “On the Integration of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technology: A Perspective About Security,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 3881-3897, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3349019.
  15. M. Cu, G. Peko, J. Chan, and D. Sundaram, “Blockchain-based Continuous Timestamps Tracking System: Towards Ownership Information Believability,” in Proc. 56th Hawaii Int. Conf. System Sciences (HICSS), 2023, pp. 5343-5352, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2023.652.
  16. Z. Yuan, J. Wu, J. Gong, Y. Liu, G. Tian, and J. Wang, “Blockchain-Based Self-Auditing Scheme with Batch Verification for Decentralized Storage,” Wireless Commun. Mobile Comput., vol. 2022, Art. no. 6998046, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6998046.
  17. M. D. Sheldon, “Tracking Tangible Asset Ownership and Provenance with Blockchain,” Journal of Information Systems, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 153-175, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.2308/ISYS-2020-042.
  18. Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Yang, and Y. Ma, “DOCS: A Data Ownership Confirmation Scheme for Distributed Data Trading,” Systems, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 226, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10060226.
  19. A. R. Nugroho, S. Anoraga, and F. Esfandiari, “Guarantee of Protection of Electronic Land Certificates as Proof of Ownership of Land Rights,” Indonesia Law Reform Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 234-242, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v3i2.29197.
  20. A. Trujillo, “Hyperownership: Beyond the Current State of Interaction with Digital Property,” in Proc. 33rd ACM Conf. Hypertext and Social Media, 2022, pp. 240-243, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3511095.3536373.


Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT by Anhalt University of Applied Sciences is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
 ·  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ICAIIT 2026
International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT
Navigation
Publisher
ISSN2199-8876
Location Anhalt University of Applied Sciences
Phone +49 (0) 3496 67 5611
Address Building 01, Room 425
Bernburger Str. 55
D-06366 Köthen, Germany
Open Access License

All works are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise noted.

Published by ICAIIT in cooperation with Anhalt University of Applied Sciences.

© 2026 ICAIIT — International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT. Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Köthen, Germany.
Visitors: site traffic counter