Proceedings of International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT  ·  2026/03/31  ·  Vol. 14  ·  Issue 1  ·  pp. 601–608
Data-Driven Gas Sensing Performance of Cuo Thin Films
Hussein Hassan Magli, Hiba Saad Rasheed, Shams Nassif Jassem, Wathiq Ayoub Taha Al Ramdhan and Rushdi Ibrahim Jasim
This study investigates the synthesis and characterization of nanostructured CuO thin films deposit via chemical spray pyrolysis (CSP), emphasizing the effect of precursor solution concentrations (0.10 M, 0.15 M, and 0.20 M) on their physical properties. XRD analysis confirmed the monoclinic CuO phase with preferred (200) orientation. Increasing molarity enhanced crystallinity, as reflected by stronger diffraction peaks, larger grain sizes (17.08-19.84 nm), and reduced dislocation density and lattice strain. Morphological evaluation using AFM and SEM showed that higher molarity improved surface uniformity and reduced roughness (Rrms from 9.27 nm to 3.63 nm), with the 0.15 M film showing the most homogeneous texture. Optical analysis revealed a decrease in bandgap energy from 2.15 eV to 2.05 eV with increasing molarity, attributed to reduced quantum confinement in larger grains. All films exhibited high absorption coefficients (>4 × 10⁴ cm⁻¹), indicating potential for optoelectronic applications. Gas-sensing measurements demonstrated p-type semiconductor behavior, with resistance decreasing upon NO₂ exposure. The 0.20 M film achieved the highest sensitivity, around 30% greater than the 0.10 M sample-due to enhanced surface reactivity and charge transport, highlighting its suitability for gas sensor applications.
Cuo Nanostructured CSP Gas Sensing Optical Properties Sensitivity Reactivity.
References
  1. U.C. Bind and R.K. Dutta, et al., “Ion implantation induced phase transformation and enhanced crystallinity of copper oxide thin films,” Superlattices Microstruct., vol. 84, pp. 24-35, 2015.
  2. D. Arunkumar, P. Francis and J. Merlineshyla, “,” Arch. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 4, p. 2174, 2012.
  3. N.M. Basith, J.J. Vijaya, L.J. Kennedy and M. Bououdina, “Structural, morphological, optical and magnetic properties of Ni-doped CuO nanostructures,” Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process., vol. 17, pp. 110-118, 2014.
  4. I. Erdogan and O. Gullu, “Optical and structural properties of CuO nanofilm: its diode application,” J. Alloys Compd., vol. 492, pp. 378-383, 2010.
  5. E.M. Alkoy and P.J. Kelly, “,” Vacuum, vol. 79, p. 221, 2005.
  6. T. Maruyama, “Copper oxide thin films prepared by chemical vapor deposition,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 85-92, 1998.
  7. G. Papadimitropoulos, N. Vourdas, V. Vamvakas and D. Davazoglou, “,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 10, p. 182, 2005.
  8. V. Saravanan, P. Shankar, et al., “Growth and characterization of copper oxide thin films,” J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, vol. 111, pp. 272-277.
  9. A.N. Tuama, K.H. Abbas, M.Q. Hamzah, S.O. Mezan, A.H. Jabbar and M.A. Agam, “An overview on characterization of Ag/Cu2O nanometallic,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 5008-5018, 2020.
  10. E. Vigil, F.A. Fernandez-Lima, J.A. Ayllon, E. Pedrero, I. Zumeta, B. Gonzalez, L. Curbelo, H.D. Fonseca-Filho, M.E.H. Maia da Costa, C. Domingo, M. Behar and F.C. Zawislak, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., vol. 109, p. 560, 2008.
  11. A.A. Jalil, et al., “Tailoring the current density to enhance photocatalytic activity of CuO,” J. Electroanal. Chem., vol. 701, pp. 50-58, 2013.
  12. W. Seiler, E. Millon, J. Perriere, R. Benzerga and C. Boulmer-Leborgne, “Epitaxial growth of copper oxide films,” J. Cryst. Growth, vol. 311, pp. 3352-3358, 2009.
  13. X. Jiang, T. Herricks and Y. Xia, “CuO nanowires synthesis by heating copper,” Nano Lett., vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 1333-1338, 2002.
  14. Y.K. Su, et al., “Controlled synthesis of CuO nanowire arrays,” J. Alloys Compd., vol. 17, no. 4, p. 783, 2007.
  15. J. Zhu, et al., “Synthesis of flower-like CuO nanostructures,” Mater. Lett., vol. 61, no. 30, p. 5236, 2007.
  16. G.Q. Yuan, et al., “Electrochemical synthesis of CuO nanocrystals,” J. Cryst. Growth, vol. 303, no. 2, p. 400, 2007.
  17. L. Yu, et al., “CuO nanoflowers synthesis and field emission,” J. Cryst. Growth, vol. 310, no. 12, p. 3125, 2008.
  18. K.H. Yoon, W.J. Choi and D.H. Kan, “Photoelectrochemical properties of copper oxide thin films,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 372, pp. 250-256, 2000.
  19. P. Richharia, K.L. Chopra and M.C. Bhatnagar, “Surface analysis of copper selective coating,” Sol. Energy Mater., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 93-109, 1991.
  20. N. Saadaldin, M.N. Alsloum and N. Hussain, “Preparation of copper oxide thin films by CBD,” vol. 74, pp. 1459-1465, 2015.
  21. V. Rajendran and J. Gajendiran, “Preparation of nanocrystalline CuO powders,” Mater. Res. Bull., vol. 56, pp. 134-137, 2014.
  22. W.T. Yao, et al., “Formation of uniform CuO nanorods,” J. Phys. Chem. B, vol. 109, no. 29, p. 14011, 2005.
  23. Y. Liu, et al., “Synthesis of copper oxide nanocrystals,” J. Mater. Chem., vol. 16, no. 2, p. 192, 2006.
  24. J. Morales, L. Sánchez, F. Martín, J.R. Ramos-Barrado and M. Sánchez, “Use of CuO thin films in lithium cells,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 474, no. 1-2, pp. 133-140, 2005.
  25. B. Balamurugan and B.R. Mehta, “Optical and structural properties of CuO films,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 396, no. 1, pp. 90-96, 2001.
  26. N. Serin, T. Serin, S. Horzum and Y. Celik, “Annealing effects on copper oxide films,” Semicond. Sci. Technol., vol. 20, pp. 398-401, 2005.
  27. J.I. Pankove, Optical Processes in Semiconductors, New Jersey, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 1971.
  28. A.A. Ogwu, E. Bouquerel, O. Ademosu, S. Moh, E. Crossan and F. Placido, “Influence of rf power on CuO films,” J. Phys. D, vol. 38, p. 266, 2005.
  29. G. Papadimitropoulos, N. Vourdas, E. Vamvakas and D. Davazoglou, “Optical and structural properties of copper oxide thin films,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 515, pp. 2428-2432, 2006.
  30. R.S. Ali, H.S. Rasheed, N.F. Habubi and S.S. Chiad, “Synthesis and characterization of Mn-doped FeS2 thin films,” Chalcogenide Lett., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 63-72, 2023.
  31. K. Phiwdang, et al., “Synthesis of CuO nanoparticles by precipitation method,” Energy Procedia, vol. 34, pp. 740-745, 2013.
  32. M.B. Jumaa, T.H. Mubarak and A.M. Mohammad, “Structural and magnetic properties of nanoferrites,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2475, 090014, 2023.
  33. S.K. Muhammad, E.S. Hassan, K.Y. Qader, K.H. Abass, S.S. Chiad and N.F. Habubi, “Effect of vanadium on SnO2 thin films,” Nano Biomed. Eng., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 67-74, 2020.
  34. J. Zhu, et al., “Highly dispersed CuO nanoparticles,” Mater. Lett., vol. 58, pp. 3324-3327, 2004.
  35. H.A. Hussin, R.S. Al-Hasnawy, R.I. Jasim, N.F. Habubi and S.S. Chiad, “Optical and structural properties of CuO thin films doped by Mn,” J. Green Eng., vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 7018-7028, 2020.
  36. K. Mageshwari and R. Sathyamoorthy, “Synthesis of CuO microspheres,” Appl. Nanosci., vol. 3, pp. 161-166, 2013.
  37. F. Wang, et al., “Gas sensor based on CuO nanoparticles,” RSC Adv., vol. 6, no. 83, pp. 79343-79349, 2016.
  38. M.A. Dar, et al., “Structural and magnetic properties of CuO nanoneedles,” Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 254, pp. 7477-7481, 2008.
  39. O.V. Abramov, et al., “Sonochemical coating of nanoparticles,” Surf. Coat. Technol., vol. 204, pp. 718-722, 2009.
  40. M.H. Yamukyan, K.V. Manukyan and S.L. Kharatyan, “Copper oxide reduction,” J. Chem. Eng., vol. 137, pp. 636-642, 2008.
  41. Z. Yang, et al., “Gas-sensing properties of CuO microspheres,” Sens. Actuators, vol. 128, pp. 293-298, 2007.
  42. Y. Xu, D. Chen and X. Jiao, “Fabrication of CuO microspheres,” J. Phys. Chem. B, vol. 109, pp. 13561-13566, 2005.
  43. Y. Zhang, et al., “CuO nanocrystals synthesis,” J. Cryst. Growth, vol. 291, pp. 196-201, 2006.
  44. J. Wang, et al., “Synthesis of CuO nanocrystals,” J. Chem. Sci., vol. 121, pp. 1077-1081, 2009.
  45. A.A. Kamil, N.A. Bakr, T.H. Mubarak and J. Al-Zanqanawee, “Synthesis of Au and Ag nanoparticles,” Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostruct., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1219-1226, 2021.
  46. H.S. Al-Rikabi, M.H. Al-Timimi and W.H. Albanda, “Morphological and optical properties of MgO-ZnS films,” Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostruct., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 889-897, 2022.
  47. E.S. Hassan, A.K. Elttayef, S.H. Mostafa, M.H. Salim and S.S. Chiad, “Silver oxide nanoparticles in gas sensors,” J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron., vol. 30, no. 17, pp. 15943-15951, 2019.
  48. S.K. Maji, et al., “Chemical synthesis of mesoporous CuO,” J. Solid State Chem., vol. 183, pp. 1900-1904, 2010.
  49. C.Y. Huang, et al., “Photoluminescence properties of CuO nanowire,” Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 256, pp. 3688-3692, 2010.
  50. H. Siddiqui, M.S. Qureshi and F.Z. Haque, “Hydrothermal synthesis of CuO tetrapods,” Optik, vol. 125, pp. 4663-4667, 2014.
  51. M.A. Vila, C. Diaz-Guerra and J. Piqueras, “Optical and magnetic properties of CuO nanowires,” J. Phys. D, vol. 43, 135403, 2010.
  52. B.A. Bader, S.K. Muhammad, A.M. Jabbar, K.H. Abass, S.S. Chiad and N.F. Habubi, “Indium-doped CdO thin films,” J. Nanostruct., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 744-750, 2020.
  53. A.S. Lanje, et al., “Synthesis and optical characterization of CuO nanoparticles,” Adv. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 2, pp. 36-40, 2010.
  54. M. Chang, H. Liu and C.Y. Tai, “Preparation of CuO nanoparticles,” Powder Technol., vol. 207, pp. 378-386, 2011.
  55. E.H. Hadi, M.A. Abbsa, A.A. Khadayeir, Z.M. Abood, N.F. Habubi and S.S. Chiad, “Effects of Mn doping on TiO2 thin films,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1664, 2020.
  56. C.L. Carnes and K.J. Klabunde, “Catalytic methanol synthesis,” J. Mol. Catal. A, vol. 194, pp. 227-236, 2003.
  57. S. Anandan, X. Wen and S. Yang, “Growth of CuO nanorod arrays,” Mater. Chem. Phys., vol. 93, pp. 35-40, 2005.
  58. P. Chand and P. Kumar, “Effect of precursors on CuO nanostructures,” Optik, vol. 156, pp. 743-753, 2018.
  59. J.R. Lakowicz, Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Boston, MA, USA: Springer, 1983.
  60. K. Mageshwari, R. Sathyamoorthy and J. Park, “Photocatalytic activity of CuO microspheres,” Powder Technol., vol. 278, pp. 150-156, 2015.
  61. P. Mallick and S. Sahu, “Optical absorption of CuO nanoparticles,” Nanosci. Nanotechnol., vol. 2, pp. 71-74, 2012.
  62. N.C. Horti, et al., “Photoluminescence properties of SnO2 nanoparticles,” Optik, vol. 169, pp. 314-320, 2018.
  63. H. Siddiqui, M.S. Qureshi and F.Z. Haque, “Wet chemical synthesis of CuO nanostructures,” Optik, vol. 127, pp. 2740-2747, 2016.
  64. R.I. Jasim, E.H. Hadi, S.S. Chiad, N.F. Habubi, M. Jadan and J.S. Addasi, “Effect of silver doping on CdSe thin films,” J. Ovonic Res., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 187-196, 2023.
  65. K.J. Muthe, Vyas, S. Narang, D. Aswal, S. Gupta, D. Bhattacharya, R. Pinto, G. Kothiyal and S. Sabharwal, “CuO phase formation during thin film deposition,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 324, pp. 37-43, 1998.
  66. S.A. Sadeq, et al., “Copper oxide nanomaterial saturable absorber,” Results Phys., vol. 10, pp. 264-269, 2018.
  67. S. Raja and M. Deepa, “Synthesis of polyaniline-copper oxide nanocomposite,” Ind. J. Adv. Chem. Sci., vol. 3, pp. 198-203, 2015.

Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT by Anhalt University of Applied Sciences is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0  ·  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ICAIIT 2026
International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT
Navigation
Publisher
ISSN2199-8876
Location Anhalt University of Applied Sciences
Phone +49 (0) 3496 67 5611
Address Building 01, Room 425
Bernburger Str. 55
D-06366 Köthen, Germany
Open Access License

All works are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise noted.

Published by ICAIIT in cooperation with Anhalt University of Applied Sciences.

© 2026 ICAIIT — International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT. Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Köthen, Germany.
Visitors: site traffic counter