Proceedings of International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT  ·  2026/03/31  ·  Vol. 14  ·  Issue 1  ·  pp. 1663–1668
The Role of Design-to-Cost Technique in Cost Reduction
Ayad Adil Alfayyadh and Manal Jabbar Soror
This study examines the effectiveness of integrating Design-to-Cost (DTC) methodology with Activity-Based Costing (ABC) to enhance cost efficiency in industrial product design. A case study approach is applied to a 120-liter electric heater manufactured by the General Company for Electrical and Electronic Industries in Iraq. The proposed framework evaluates cost reduction opportunities during the conceptual design stage through material substitution, labor optimization, and overhead cost restructuring. A comparative analysis between traditional costing and the DTC-based model is conducted to assess performance differences in terms of cost and resource efficiency. The results show that the optimized design reduces unit cost from 108,965 IQD to 89,098 IQD, achieving a cost saving of 19,867 IQD per unit while maintaining product functionality and quality. The study demonstrates that early-stage cost integration significantly improves resource allocation efficiency and supports more informed engineering decisions. The findings highlight the practical value of combining DTC and ABC as a structured approach for cost-driven product development in manufacturing environments.
Design-to-Cost (DTC) Cost Reduction Activity-Based Costing (ABC) Product Design Cost Management Target Costing Manufacturing Cost Electric Heater.
References
  1. S. P. Pereira, “Implementing a design to cost strategy in a complex aerospace design project,” Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisboa, Portugal, pp. 1-10, 2015.
  2. A. Retolaza and I. Ezpeleta, “Design to cost: A framework for large industrial products: Evolution,” in 31st CIRP Design Conference, 2021, pp. 828-833, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.036.
  3. A. Hari, S. Shoval, and J. Kasser, “Conceptual design to cost: A new systems engineering tool,” INCOSE International Symposium, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 543-557, 2008.
  4. J. Gardan, “Definition of users’ requirements in the customized product design through a user-centered translation method,” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), vol. 11, pp. 813-821, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-015-0275-2.
  5. G. Sun, M. Deng, G. Zheng, and Q. Li, “Design for cost performance of crashworthy structures made of high strength steel,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 138, pp. 458-472, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.07.014.
  6. C. Favi, M. Germani, and M. Mandolini, “Design for manufacturing and assembly vs. design to cost: Toward a multi-objective approach for decision-making strategies during conceptual design of complex products,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 50, pp. 275-280, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.190.
  7. A. Jain, A. Badonia, and S. Lomash, “Design to cost-imperatives to industry today: Evolution,” Industrial Engineering Letters, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1-4, 2016.
  8. P. Kopacek, “Development trends in cost-oriented production automation,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 51, no. 30, pp. 39-43, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.242.
  9. B. Jørgensen, “Designing to target cost: One approach to design/construction integration,” in Architectural Management: Designing Value, DTU/CIB, pp. 311-319, 2005.
  10. S. Sild, “Design to cost principles explained,” Fractory, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://fractory.com/design-to-cost-dtc/, [Accessed: Oct. 19, 2024].
  11. Capgemini and Effidyn, “Combining cost cutting and customer value in the search for competitiveness: The ‘Design to Cost’ perspective,” Capgemini, France, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://www.capgemini.com/consulting-fr/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2017/08/design_to_cost.pdf, [Accessed: Oct. 19, 2024].
  12. D. Lauritano, L. Limongelli, G. Moreo, G. Favia, and F. Carinci, “Nanomaterials for periodontal tissue engineering: Chitosan-based scaffolds,” Nanomaterials, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1-16, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10040605.
  13. L. Muthukrishnan, “Nanotechnology for cleaner leather production: A review,” Environmental Chemistry Letters, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 2527-2549, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01172-w.
  14. Y. Shang, M. K. Hasan, G. J. Ahammed, M. Li, H. Yin, and J. Zhou, “Applications of nanotechnology in plant growth and crop protection: A review,” Molecules, vol. 24, no. 14, pp. 1-23, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24142558.
  15. F. Cescon, A. Costantini, and L. Grassetti, “Strategic choices and strategic management accounting in large manufacturing firms,” Journal of Management and Governance, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 605-636, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9431-y.

Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT by Anhalt University of Applied Sciences is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0  ·  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ICAIIT 2026
International Conference on Applied Innovation in IT
Navigation
Publisher
ISSN2199-8876
Location Anhalt University of Applied Sciences
Phone +49 (0) 3496 67 5611
Address Building 01, Room 425
Bernburger Str. 55
D-06366 Köthen, Germany
Open Access License

All works are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise noted.

Published by ICAIIT in cooperation with Anhalt University of Applied Sciences.

© 2026 ICAIIT — International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT. Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Köthen, Germany.
Visitors: site traffic counter